Of late, the word “government” has been frequently followed by dispiriting nouns like “shutdown,” “gridlock,” and “dysfunction.” By contrast, government-funded science has recently produced some high profile discoveries, although most news coverage of the work did not link the discoveries to government funding. One game changing finding worth highlighting from last week changes the way we think about genetics, the brain, and individual differences. First, a little background.
The world of genetics was shaken in 2007 by the discovery of “de novo” mutations associated with autism.1 These mutations were spontaneous changes in DNA sequence that were present in affected children but not in DNA from either parent’s blood cells. Apparently these mutations accumulated in the father’s sperm cells as these cells divided through multiple generations during his lifespan. Presumably older fathers had more of these spontaneous mutations. Indeed, epidemiological studies had reported that fathers over 40 were at higher risk for having children diagnosed with autism or schizophrenia.
Over the past 3 years, spontaneous mutations have been found to be much more common than we thought. And these mutations are not only transmitted from sperm but develop later in the fetus or even in rapidly dividing cells in adults. In fact, it appears that mutations are occurring all the time because DNA replication is surprisingly prone to errors. Many of these replication errors are of no consequence, but mutations in tumor suppressor genes appear to be the mechanism by which cancers arise in rapidly dividing cells of the gut or skin. These errors are called “somatic mutations” because they occur in select mature cells of the body. They are distinguished from “germline” mutations found in the stem cells of the embryo and retained in all cells of the body. Because of somatic mutations our bodies have multiple genomes: different mutations may be found in cells from gut, skin, or blood.
Somatic mutations have been a hot topic for cancer and stem cell biologists, but neuroscientists or psychiatric geneticists did not really worry about this problem because adult neurons do not divide. The genetics of mental illness has been based on DNA extracted from blood cells. Because we were not worried about the possibility of multiple genomes in a single person, we assumed that the genome of blood cells should tell us what we needed to know about DNA. Until recently, no one even worried enough about somatic mutations in brain to look for them.
Last year, Chris Walsh and his team at Harvard’s Children’s Hospital showed that rare neurodevelopmental disorders could result from somatic mutations found in a single area of the brain.2 Increased growth of one hemisphere of the brain was caused by a mutation in a growth gene called AKT3 only in cells from the enlarged hemisphere, not in the normally developing hemisphere and, importantly, not in blood cells.
Last week, groups led by Fred Gage of the Salk Institute and Ira Hall of the University of Virginia took the first careful look at DNA sequences in single neurons of a normal human frontal cortex.3 In a Science paper published online on Halloween, they reported the rather spooky finding that 41 percent of neurons had a major mutation, often unique to that cell. These mutations were not subtle: many involved deletions of more than a million bases of DNA and some involved duplications of chromosomes. Just as our bodies contain multiple genomes, it appears that our brains exhibit intense variation, perhaps greater than other tissues. How could this happen if neurons don’t divide? Actually, neurons during fetal development divide more rapidly than almost any other tissue known, with replication rates estimated at 100,000 divisions per minute from week 10 to week 24 of gestation when the brain surpasses 10 billion cells. It should therefore come as no surprise that somatic mutations are abundant in brain. Indeed, wouldn’t it be even more amazing if they did not occur?
Are these mutations, often found in single cells, important? Is this the source for differences in identical twins? Could these de novo mechanisms explain why or how some “apples fall far from the tree”? Is brain genome variation the ultimate cause of individual differences? We really don’t know yet how to interpret this extraordinary amount of variation in the brain. In cancer biology, mutations in tumor suppressor genes or cell cycle genes have proven to be not only the drivers for tumor growth but targets for successful treatments. Somatic mutations in the brain could be the proximate cause of mental illness or mental gifts, but we still need to know which cells to study and we need tools for translating the changes in DNA sequence to changes in brain function.
A thoughtful commentary accompanying the Science paper is titled “Our Fallen Genomes.”4 In the biomedical world, finding that DNA replication is so prone to error suggests risk. Darwin, knowing nothing of DNA or mutation, argued that variation is the engine of evolution. Whether somatic mutation generates risk or opportunity, it certainly increases complexity. And it reminds us that there is no substitute for studying the brain.
1 Sebat J et al. Strong association of de novo copy number mutations with autism. Science. 2007 Apr 20;316(5823):445-9. Epub 2007 Mar 15.
2 Poduri A et al. Somatic activation of AKT3 causes hemispheric developmental brain malformations. Neuron. 2012 Apr 12;74(1):41-8. doi: 0.1016/j.neuron.2012.03.010.
3 McConnell MJ et al. Mosaic copy number variation in human neurons. Science. 2013 Nov 1;342(6158):632-7. doi: 10.1126/science.1243472.
4 Macosko EZ, McCarroll SA. Genetics. Our fallen genomes. Science. 2013 Nov 1;342(6158):564-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1246942.