Skip to main content

Transforming the understanding
and treatment of mental illnesses.

Celebrating 75 Years! Learn More >>

 Archived Content

The National Institute of Mental Health archives materials that are over 4 years old and no longer being updated. The content on this page is provided for historical reference purposes only and may not reflect current knowledge or information.

Brain Processes Underlying the Extinction and Reactivation of Fear Memories

Research Highlight

Exposure therapy is a technique often used to reduce or eliminate learned fear. During exposure therapy, people are repeatedly exposed to a fear-provoking stimulus in the absence of a negative or aversive outcome. Over time, this exposure helps reduce emotional and physiological responses associated with the learned-fear. Although exposure therapy and fear extinction have shown effectiveness, fear memories can sometimes relapse over time — an event called “spontaneous recovery.”

Image showing immunofluorescence of fear-acquisition tagged neurons in the dentate gyrus during spontaneous recovery. Credit: Springer Nature; Lacagnina et al. 2019

Caption: Image showing immunofluorescence of fear-acquisition tagged neurons in the dentate gyrus during spontaneous recovery. Credit: Springer Nature; Lacagnina et al. 2019

Research suggests that spontaneous recovery may occur because extinction training does not erase fear memories. Instead, research suggests that extinction training creates a new memory that either suppresses the fear memory or competes with it for expression. In a study published in 2019  in the journal Nature Neuroscience, researchers funded by the National Institute of Mental Health investigated the neurobiological changes that occur in the brain circuits of mice when contextual fear memories — fear of a place where an aversive event occurred — are formed and extinguished.

The researchers focused on part of the hippocampus — a brain structure involved in learning and memory — called the dentate gyrus. The dentate gyrus contains groups of neurons that are activated during acquisition of a memory and reactivated during memory recall. These neurons are called “engram cells,” and their reactivation is necessary for memory recall. The researchers used techniques to genetically tag and manipulate engram cells to see how their activity changed during the formation, extinction, and spontaneous recovery of a fear memory.

The findings suggest that during extinction training, the engram cells associated with the fear memory are suppressed and a second set of engram cells associated with the extinction memory are activated. During the spontaneous recovery of fear, the engram cells associated with the fear memory become more active than the engram cells associated with the extinction memory.

To learn more about the role of the engram cells during fear acquisition, extinction, and spontaneous recovery, the researchers used a technique called optogenetics — which uses light to control the activation of cells — to turn on and off the activity of the engram cells related to fear acquisition and fear extinction. The results suggest that stimulating the engram cells associated with fear acquisition results in the spontaneous recovery of the fear memory while stimulating the engram cells associated with fear extinction reduces the spontaneous recovery of the fear memory.

Together, these results suggest that in mice, fear acquisition and fear extinction recruit different groups of engram cells in the dentate gyrus and that interaction between these two groups of cells might be involved in fear recovery following extinction learning. Fear relapse is a challenge for successful exposure therapies. These findings point to brain mechanisms that could be explored as potential therapeutic targets for fear-associated behaviors in humans.

Reference

Lacagnina, A. F., Brockway, E. T., Crovetti, C. R., Shue, F., McCarty, M. J., Sattler, K. P., … & Drew, M. R. (2019). Distinct hippocampal engrams control extinction and relapse of fear memory. Nature Neuroscience, 22, 753–761. Doi: 10.1038/s41593-019-0361-z

Grants

MH111243 , MH106454 , MH102595 , MH117426 , EY026446 , OD017908